The missing are seen to be as such at the beginning of the coming Tribulation.   And they claim that the Scriptures support their view to be more truthful than the Post-Trib view.  So is this true?  I wrote about the arguments for the Pre-Trib position beginning in Sept. of 2019 as a series, but I want to revisit one of these here today.  My reason is because I hear this started constantly by Christian’s on Instagram:  so if you believe that the Church is missing you must be able to believe even through this evidence presented here from the Scriptures in 2019: 

https://raptureonline.blog/2019/10/01/reason-3-why-dispensationalists-believe-that-the-church-will-not-be-hear-for-the-tribulation/

Should you want to explore this entire series I will leave a link to the others in the comment section below.  But just to reinforce my points made in this 2019 post; I ask: why if one is going to use the argument of the absence of a “word”; then would they not first define that word and rule out its synonyms as well.  So for further arguments against the position, Just page down to review it and to leave your own comment.  Thanks